Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Chevrolet Malibu 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 11 HP less power than Chevrolet Malibu, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Chevrolet Malibu. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring and Chevrolet Malibu are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 464 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`920 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |