Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Volvo S80 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 73 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 18 NM less than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 7.8 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
| Chrysler Sebring has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo S80. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |