Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Honda Accord 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 223 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 13 HP more power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Honda Accord. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.4 | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 18 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 459 litres | |
| Chrysler Sebring has 4 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Honda Accord has
| |