Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 58 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 72 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.0 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 11 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 45 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |