Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Skoda Superb 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 53 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Skoda Superb. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.3 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Skoda Superb 2002 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |