Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Skoda Superb 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 203 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 262 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 88 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.4 | |
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.47 m | |
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 462 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 7 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`400 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |