Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring and Chrysler 300M have the same engine power, but Chrysler Sebring torque is 6 NM more than Chrysler 300M. Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.5 | |
| Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler 300M gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is smaller. Chrysler Sebring is 16 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300M, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage space. Chrysler Sebring has 75 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |