Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Chevrolet Epica 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Epica is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 53 HP more power than Chevrolet Epica, but torque is 58 NM less than Chevrolet Epica. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 6.1 | |
|
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 645 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Epica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 25 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |