Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Volvo S80 2003

 
Chrysler Sebring
2003 - 2006
Volvo S80
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.7 Petrol2.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 203 HP196 HP
Torque: 262 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds8.9 seconds
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving.
Chrysler Sebring engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 18 NM less than Volvo S80. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.211.0
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway950 km on highway
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.82 m
Width: 1.79 m1.83 m
Height: 1.39 m1.43 m
Chrysler Sebring is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1106 litres
Chrysler Sebring has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`990no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 10001600
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Sebring has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S80 has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv