Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Audi A6 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler Sebring) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi A6) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 22 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 188 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.4 | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Audi A6 2004: The vehicle features full-time Quattro IV all-wheel drive with Torsen center differential and electronic traction control, which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) and applies braking to spinning wheels, with the effect of locking the front and rear differentials. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid | Used also on Volkswagen Phaeton | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi A6 2004 3.0 engine: The car engine may require significant maintenance and part replacements as mileage increases. Between 200,000 and 300,000 km, the costly timing chain might need replacement, while the drive belt has a shorter ... More about Audi A6 2004 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is smaller. Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 546 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Chrysler Sebring has 91 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`345 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Audi A6 has
| |