Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Jaguar S-Type 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler Sebring) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jaguar S-Type) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 435 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar S-Type is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 4 HP less power than Jaguar S-Type, whereas torque is 173 NM less than Jaguar S-Type. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.0 | |
|
The Jaguar S-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar S-Type, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar S-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar S-Type) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Sebring engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is smaller. Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm shorter than the Jaguar S-Type, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler Sebring has 85 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar S-Type. The Jaguar S-Type may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jaguar S-Type. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`255 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Jaguar S-Type has
| |