Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 47 HP more power than Chevrolet Epica, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Chevrolet Epica. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.3 | |
|
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Epica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Sebring engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 25 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |