Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 60 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Chrysler 300M. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 10.5 | |
| Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is smaller. Chrysler Sebring is 16 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300M, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage space. Chrysler Sebring has 75 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |