Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 2 HP less power than Chevrolet Malibu, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 8.7 | |
|
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm longer than the Chevrolet Malibu, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 436 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 436 litres | |
| Chrysler Sebring has 19 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Malibu, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |