Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 141 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 188 NM | 188 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Chrysler Sebring engine produces 1 HP more power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.7 | |
Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
Chrysler Sebring gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.29 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.60 m | |
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 55 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 21 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |