Chrysler Sebring 2009 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 257 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 7 HP less power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Chrysler 300C. Despite less power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 11.0 | |
|
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is smaller. Chrysler Sebring is 17 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 630 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1602 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Chrysler Sebring has 189 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.87 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |