Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Mazda 6 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 23 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Mazda 6. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.7 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Jeep Compass | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 6 2007 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 9 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 519 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 78 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.13 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.27 metres less than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |