Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Ford Mondeo 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring and Ford Mondeo have the same engine power, but Chrysler Sebring torque is 10 NM less than Ford Mondeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| 960 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Galaxy, Ford C-Max, Ford S-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Mondeo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 1 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 394 litres | 554 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 160 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |