Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Volkswagen EOS 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 44 HP less power than Volkswagen EOS, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volkswagen EOS. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 44 cm longer than the Volkswagen EOS, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 380 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 12 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |