Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Volvo C70 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 172 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 222 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
Chrysler Sebring engine produces 32 HP more power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Volvo C70. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
Volvo C70 2006 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo C70 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.40 m | |
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 27 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 200 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 404 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 7 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 1.6 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`090 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
| |