Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 37 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Mercedes CLK. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 20 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 276 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 83 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |