Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 23 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, but torque is 70 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.6 | |
|
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Sebring gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Mercedes CLK 2005 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes CLK 2005 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 28 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 276 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
371 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 83 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`175 | 2`135 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |