Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Renault Megane 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Renault Megane. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.8 | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 57 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
369 litres | 490 litres | |
| Chrysler Sebring has 3 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 121 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.9 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Chrysler Sebring can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`175 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Renault Megane has
| |