Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Volvo C70 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo C70 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volvo C70. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Sebring gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 35 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
369 litres | 404 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 7 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo C70 (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 1.6 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`175 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |