Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 29 HP more power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.9 | |
|
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Sebring gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 46 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |