Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Chevrolet Epica 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring and Chevrolet Epica have the same engine power, but Chrysler Sebring torque is 20 NM less than Chevrolet Epica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.1 | |
| Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 39 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |