Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Sebring is available with front wheel drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 12.3 seconds | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 10.6 | 11.7 - 12.4 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.30 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 1 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`990 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
| |