Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs SAAB 9-3 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 130 - 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 177 - 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 12.3 seconds | 7.1 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 10.2 | 8.8 - 11.0 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Sebring is 29 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 295 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 25 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 1 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Chrysler Sebring can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`990 | ~ 1`823 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |