Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 143 - 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 214 - 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 12.3 seconds | 7.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 10.2 | 9.9 - 10.8 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler PT Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 63 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`990 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |