Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Mercedes SL 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler Sebring is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mercedes SL is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Sebring is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes SL can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 3.5 - 6.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 272 - 612 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 350 - 999 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 12.3 seconds | 4.2 - 6.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 10.2 | 10.3 - 15.1 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SL. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.30 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 38 cm longer than the Mercedes SL, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 339 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 85 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SL. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`990 | ~ 2`247 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Mercedes SL has
| |