Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs BMW 6 series 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Sebring is available with front wheel drive, while BMW 6 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 3.0 - 4.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 258 - 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 300 - 490 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 12.3 seconds | 5.7 - 7.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 10.2 | 9.6 - 13.0 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 6 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 10 cm longer than the BMW 6 series, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 350 litres | |
| Chrysler Sebring has 20 litres more trunk space than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`990 | ~ 2`194 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
| |