Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Volvo C70 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 235 HP | 136 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 339 NM | 220 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 11.8 seconds | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 11.1 | 6.1 - 9.8 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo C70. On average, Chrysler Sebring equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 29 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
371 litres | 404 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.13 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 1.57 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`175 kg | ~ 2`064 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`775 kg | ~ 1`620 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 400 kg | ~ 444 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |