Chrysler Sebring 1994 vs Honda Civic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 166 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 - 230 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 11 seconds | 10.1 - 11.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 11.5 | 7.0 - 8.1 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 32 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 35 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Civic has
| |