Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Alfa Romeo GT 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.0 (petrol) | 1.7 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Alfa Romeo GT is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 203 HP | 140 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 214 - 278 NM | 163 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 6.7 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 10.1 | 6.7 - 12.4 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo GT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 34 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo GT, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 140 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo GT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Alfa Romeo GT has
| |