Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 72 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 120 - 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.4 seconds | 10.2 - 16.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.4 | 6.4 - 8.7 | |
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 57 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 372 litres | |
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 83 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 1.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Chrysler Sebring can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`943 | ~ 1`608 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |