Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Honda Accord 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 140 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.4 seconds | 7.9 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.4 | 5.4 - 9.4 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 18 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 459 litres | |
| Chrysler Sebring has 4 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`943 | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Honda Accord has
| |