Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Honda Civic 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.8 (petrol, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 95 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 123 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.4 seconds | 7.5 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.4 | 4.6 - 9.8 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 36 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 30 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Chrysler Sebring can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`943 | ~ 1`679 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Honda Civic has
| |