Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler Sebring is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chrysler 300M is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 203 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 256 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.4 seconds | 8.8 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.4 | 10.5 - 10.7 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300M. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is smaller. Chrysler Sebring is 16 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300M, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage space. Chrysler Sebring has 75 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`943 | ~ 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |