Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.4 seconds | 10.7 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.4 | 8.8 - 9.6 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Evanda. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 7 cm longer than the Chevrolet Evanda, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.8 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Chrysler Sebring can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`943 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |