Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Chevrolet Epica is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.4 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.4 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`943 kg | ~ 1`985 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`453 kg | ~ 1`565 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 490 kg | ~ 420 kg | |
| Chrysler Sebring load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Chevrolet Epica. Therefore, Chrysler Sebring is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |