Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.5 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 235 HP | 120 - 210 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 339 NM | 167 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 11.3 seconds | 7.5 - 11.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 9.9 | 5.8 - 9.5 | |
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. On average, Chrysler Sebring equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 21 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.13 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.33 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`040 | ~ 1`577 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |