Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chrysler Sebring
2006 - 2010
Chrysler PT Cruiser
2000 - 2006
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 3.51.6 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 140 - 235 HP115 - 223 HP
Torque: 190 - 339 NM157 - 332 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 - 11.3 seconds7.5 - 13.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.2 - 9.96.9 - 10.5
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler PT Cruiser. On average, Chrysler Sebring equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.32 m
Width: 1.84 m1.70 m
Height: 1.50 m1.55 m
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower.
Chrysler Sebring is 53 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 441 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.13 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.030000000000001 metres more than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`040~ 1`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 16001000
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Sebring has
  • lower fuel consumption
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv