Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 235 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 339 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 11.3 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 9.9 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. On average, Chrysler Sebring equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 39 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.13 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.33 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`040 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |