Chrysler Pacifica 2003 vs Volvo XC90 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 90 HP more power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 1 NM less than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Chrysler Pacifica reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 9.1 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Pacifica consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger, but lower. Chrysler Pacifica is 25 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 369 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 369 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | 2404 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 154 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 2.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |