Chrysler Pacifica 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 113 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 1 NM less than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Chrysler Pacifica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 6.7 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Pacifica consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 690 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Pacifica engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Pacifica engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Pacifica is 41 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 23 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 369 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 369 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | 952 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 1298 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.7 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |