Chrysler Pacifica 2003 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 73 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Thanks to more power Chrysler Pacifica reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 12.7 | |
|
The Chrysler Pacifica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Pacifica consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Pacifica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Pacifica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Pacifica is 4 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 369 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 369 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | 4130 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1880 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 2.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |