Chrysler Pacifica 2003 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 93 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 126 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Chrysler Pacifica reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Pacifica consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Pacifica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Pacifica engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger. Chrysler Pacifica is 51 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 26 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 369 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 369 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | 1705 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 545 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 1.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |