Chrysler Pacifica 2003 vs Dodge Durango 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 349 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 509 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 96 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 14.6 | |
|
The Chrysler Pacifica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Pacifica consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Chrysler Pacifica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.89 m | |
| Chrysler Pacifica is 5 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 369 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 369 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`995 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |