Chrysler Pacifica 2006 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler Pacifica) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 257 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 15 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 285 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 100 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Town & Country, Dodge Caravan, Volkswagen Routan | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Pacifica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger, but lower. Chrysler Pacifica is 10 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 535 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |