Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Kia Carnival 2014
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.6 Hybrid | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Chrysler Pacifica) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Kia Carnival) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 264 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 318 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 6 HP less power than Kia Carnival. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 2.8 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 20.20 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Range per fill-up: | 2280 km in combined cycle | no data | |
| Chrysler Pacifica gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 171 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Kia Carnival can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Kia Carnival version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.12 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Pacifica is 6 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 915 litres | 359 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 915 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 359 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3979 litres | 2335 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 1644 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.9 metres more than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`858 kg | 2`990 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`262 kg | 1`968 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 596 kg | 1`022 kg | |
| Chrysler Pacifica load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 71 procentiem less than Kia Carnival. Therefore, Kia Carnival is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |